"Our model showed that two equal heads are better than one for solving a problem," he says. "But if the abilities of two people are very different, they are probably better off working alone."
The study appears in the Aug. 27 issue of Science.
More from WebMD Andrew B. Muir, MDHansa Bhargava, MD, FAAPLa dieta mediterr nea podr a prevenir el da o cerebral relacionado con el accidente cerebrovascularEl riesgo de autismo aumenta con la edad de la madre
"If you have a stock trader with a very good track record for picking stocks and one with a poor record, the company may earn less money if they are asked to work as a team," he says. "But two highly competent ones Pouch Prada might make more money for the company by working together.".
agree, the two volunteers discussed the matter and came up with a joint decision.
Joint Decisions Often BetterBahador Bahrami, PhD, designed the study to test the "two heads" hypothesis during his time as a UCL research fellow.
"Joint decisions don't work when a member of the team is incompetent, but doesn't know it," he says.
believe the findings have real world applications, especially in situations where competence is quantifiable.
screens and asked to recall when they saw an "oddball" image with a slightly higher contrast than the others. When their answers did not Prada Bags Sling
Real World ApplicationsThe findings suggest people can work together most effectively when they understand their individual competence level, Frith says.
But when a competent person was paired with someone who wasn't so competent, group and individual performance suffered.
He does Prada Sling Bag Red
Making Is Better Than Solo
In one experiment, pairs of volunteers were briefly shown weak images on separate computer Prada Bags Purple
The findings challenge the prevailing wisdom that groups rarely outperform their best individual members, neuroscientist and researcher Chris Frith tells WebMD.
In a study of shared decision making, researchers from the University College London (UCL) showed that two people of equal abilities solved problems better when they worked together.
Aug. 26, 2010 The old adage "two heads are better than one" really is true when both heads are equally competent, new research finds.
Some volunteers were better at the task than others, but the joint decisions proved to be more accurate more often than individual ones when two people were paired who were equally good or equally bad at identifying the oddball images.
In another experiment designed to explore the impact of incompetence on shared decision making, one person was shown clear images while that person's partner was shown images that were much more difficult to see.
In this case, when the volunteer with the good information conferred with a partner made incompetent by bad information, joint decisions tended to be worse than individual ones made by the better performing partner.
"Attention spans can wander in trials like this, but it is not likely to happen to two people at the same time," he says.
Frith believes this may be because individuals tend to lose focus over time.
Bahrami acknowledges that such self insight is uncommon in the real world.
"If you ask a group of people whether they are above average drivers, most of them will say yes," he says. "But this is logically wrong because everyone can't be above average."
Polo Shirt Supplier Nz
Us Polo Assn Clothing Uk
Fred Perry Coat
Prada Crossbody Men
Lacoste Polo Shirts Wholesale Philippines
Prada Nylon Saffiano Bag
Prada Bag In Bag
Card Holder Prada
Prada Bags Images And Prices
Prada Bags Colors
Prada Bag Leather
Prada Sunglasses On Women
Polo Neck T Shirts Buy Online